The”51st-State Party “of New Zealand 

The 51st-State Party of New Zealand

A letter to the Nation

for a HighQuality picture click photo

We the People

Have you had enough of the numerous broken hollow promises made, like cheaper rates, cheaper property taxes, especially so in these days of hardship, and these go totally ignored whoever is elected into office, for the council are continually seeking more rates and pay increases.  It seems the more you give the council, the more they want for their idyllic lifestyles, and then to be a friend of the council (for reasons unknown) this means something important to desire and acquire.  However, New Zealand’s indoctrination department, the newspapers,  do pedal that you the voter has only two voting choices between either the Tweedledum and Tweedledee candidates, I may add weeks before the closing of the nominations.  I fear a governmental order has gone out to neutralize these unwanted, or the undesirable non-Tweedledum or Tweedledee candidates.  Therefore they must be vaporized in New Zealand terms, therefore they do not exist, or whatever, subsequently they will receive very little election coverage.  Every Christchurch ratepayer becomes frightened, of any talk concerning new property valuation increases, entirely based on fabricated hypothetical property price increases, especially in a market of shrinking employment, diminishing incomes and slow property prices.  Yet the council has a bountiful supply of money, therefore has no concern whatsoever to the decline of the Christchurch resident’s living standards, while it appears to all and sundry that the council spends up big time on frivolous projects, as well as helping out the friends of the council.  The high-rate of New Zealand inflation means, that the elderly who are now living in their own homes, eventually, will be gradually forced out of their homes onto the streets, just to satisfy the hungry, greedy, council’s sensational demands for rating monies, to finance their opulent lifestyles, as well as I fear the many of the City of London hangers-on.  In California, they have legislated to protect the elderly homeowners from property tax increases.

I want you the people, the voters, to become angry and start getting mad, and I want you say, I am human, and I am no longer putting up with all these governmental and council lies any more.  As ordained, I am not going to allow Tweedledum or Tweedledee parties, or the news media, controlled somewhat by one man in this world, in running my life.  I want you to say, I have had enough, by voting for the”51st-State Party”,  I am going to abandon forever the Tweedledee and Tweedledum political parties.  I am all for the ”51st-State Party” throwing out the City of London obligators, along with Mrs. Windsor and her entourage, out of New Zealand, as well as offering New Zealand its freedom, independence and a better standard of livelihood for its people.  I realize that by continually voting for the Tweedledum or Tweedledee party’s = perpetual slavery.  Voting for the”51st-State Party”, is the only party that offers real freedom and a better standard of living.

Would you the voter be interested in joining the”51st-State Party” of New Zealand,  which stands for integrity, and not subject to the controls and influences of the City of London obligators, working in the background ? 

To read the truth as to what is going on in New Zealand, then read on.

You may ask the question, why should the New Zealand people be interested in the”51st-State Party”?  The answer is quite simple, supposing today for every $1000 unit you save, in any high-interest bearing banking account, not overlooking the paying the annual withholding tax.  Using New Zealand’s economic data collected over 42 years, as a point of reference; in 42 years’ time in the future, that the $1000 invested in the high interest bearing accounts, plus all the accumulated compound interest, this would only buy $20 of groceries on today’s monetary values.  The truth is that the New Zealand government is printing lots and lots of worthless money, consequently insurance policies and savings, are now a big joke to be reliant on for one’s retirement.  You may ask who is feathering their nests with all this money; the answer is the obligates of the City of London, (British Government) who are waxing rich by the British parent banks  ripping-off the New Zealand public, through using their banks and financial institutions that have Australian familiar sounding names.  You the voter, maybe rubbing your hands with glee after the recent budget tax-cuts, offset by a small increase in GST.  While the recent tax cuts are very deceptive, and appear by many to be mainly benefitting the wealthy.  However, the real losers are the hardworking New Zealand saver, while the New Zealand government is purposefully creating inflation, as well as undervaluing the currency, to pay for the government’s deficit tax shortfalls, in order to balance the books.  Furthermore, the imposition of this pariah, as well as other New Zealand governments, which is solely to look after their financial supporters, as well as their City of London backers and interests, for they cannot keep its hands off the crank handle of the money printing press.  Using historical data, the New Zealand saver needs to earn 12% on his/her savings, even after paying withholding tax, to keep up with devaluations and inflation, this is simple to prove just by using Mathcad.  The New Zealand government “are a bunch of liars”,  when they mislead you the public up the garden path, that New Zealand inflation has only gone up by some minuscule figure, when inflation has actually gone up about 2.5 times since 2000.  The higher salaries commission pay rates in the meantime, have as a guesstimate, gone up by around four times, and who is paying for it?  It is the muggings New Zealand saver.  These recent budget tax cuts make no sense whatsoever, when there are a record number of companies closing their doors each week in New Zealand, as well as a large number of people going on and claiming an unemployment benefit.  I ask myself, where is the money coming from to payout these newly on line tax consumers?  A sobering thought, that next year in 2011, the baby boomers are becoming tax consumers, for they are going to swamp the social services, like hospitals, governmental superannuation and so on.  This pretentious New Zealand government is fully aware of this, other than to appease the British authorities, this does not make any sense having tax cuts in these uncertain times, during what is going to be known as the greatest depression of all times.  However, it has been ordained, that the New Zealand people are required to take a reduction in their living standards, by being paid and accepting essentially worthless money.  This is the reason why in overseas elite Jewish banking circles, they frequently mention New Zealand as “fantasy antipodies”, with the untold crazies running the New Zealand government. 

The City of London obligates, controls all manner of the New Zealand government, the political Tweedledum and Tweedledee parties, the councils, news media, and even have input into social welfare spending policies, increasing GST and even demanding the scraping of New Zealand’s MMP voting system.  The real prime ministers of New Zealand are Gordon Brown, and David Campbell, or whatever, for they give the orders over the phone to our Prime Minster.  Then this so-called Prime Minster of New Zealand, from whatever Tweedledum or Tweedledee party, whoever is in power, stands to attention, clicks his or her heels, and replies “Ja Whol”, then salutes a beaming picture of Mrs. Windsor, then faithfully carries out the order.  E.g., like the British forcing New Zealand in sending troops to Afghanistan.  

What’s more, you must realize historically, the New Zealand political party politics, are entirely molded on the British Tweedledum and Tweedledee political voting system, which pretentiously makes the class division, the influencing and deciding voting factor.  Another name, this could be called, class warfare.

E.g., “I let Tweedledum or Tweedledee, do all my thinking for me, aren’t I clever,” these kinds of words been uttered, says it all. 

Then you have elite members of the New Zealand governmental people , laughingly referring to the “unwashed” in vulgar terms, as the 99.98% D*** W** Factor (dimwit), that’s what they think of the public’s input into any of the New Zealand’s governmental decision processes.  

The ”51st-State Party” distances itself with the Tweedledum and Tweedledee political parties, and certainly the New Zealand public will never wake up one morning to discover that the ”51st-State Party” is in bed, or will ever collaborate with these political bedfellows.

Food for thought, New Zealand’s economic wellbeing and state of health, comes something like 72^nd place out of 73 places, amongst all the combined states and provinces of the United States, Canada, Australia, with New Zealand just narrowly beating Prince Edward Island.  By international banking circles, it is widely known that New Zealand has the distinct reputation, of having the worst refined governmental corruption practices, in the entire OECD.  In New Zealand, while the poor man looked out of his gate in bewilderment, the beaming elite New Zealand civil servant looked out from their dacha. 

The corruption is so widespread in all spheres of New Zealand’s economic life, attributed mainly by the British influences over the years, and driven by New Zealand civil service for their own self-interests.  The Obligors of the City of London, their corruptions, and influences, over time have debased the New Zealand electoral system.  Most notably, the Obligors ever since 1984, have instrumented the creation of usury banking charges in New Zealand, something like 2% on every financial transition made in New Zealand, originally created under the disguise and promotion of economic deregulation policies.  The usury charge works somewhat like a GST tax (Goods and service tax); the only difference being that the New Zealand taxpayer pays the usury charge, indirectly to “the City of London”, through its banking subsidiaries, in all likely probability, the British shareholding Australian banks.  The usury outgoings appear on the nation’s books, camouflaged as loan repayments, or as invisibles.  This usury charge is just for using New Zealand‘s own money, and has nothing do with the following category’s, like paying back loans, interest, or services.  Most people are completely ignorant as to the manufacture of money from debt, which in reality is solely imaginary phony money in circulation, more or less created out of thin air.  One can easy estimate the “usury charges”, by the amount of the nation’s cash turnover.  The problem is opening the government books, in obtaining the exact details; I believe this figure as a guesstimate, to be >4 Billion New Zealand dollars a year in usury charges.  Depending on your point of view, there are one million taxpayers in New Zealand out of a total population of 4 million people, which means one person in four is working.  Each one of the average-working taxpayers is paying the City of London $80 a week, from their taxes, or alternatively every inhabitant of New Zealand is paying $20 a week; or otherwise everybody is paying the GST, to pay the City of London’s imposed usury charges for using one’s own money.  That is why New Zealand’s taxation is so high; and that is why there is no longer government funding available for social services, like hospitals, pensions, welfare, etc. 

Like Britain, New Zealand since 2009 has adopted the British healthcare policies, called CARE, which spells out rationed healthcare policies.  CARE policies are especially life threatening to New Zealand women and the old aged.  E.g. in New Zealand, proven drugs like Zocor (known as Lipex in New Zealand) are discouraged and no longer available on the healthcare cut-rate price list, and the hospital health officials tell you to put the cheaper unfamiliar replacement substitutes down the toilet. 

You could analysis it another way; GST returns around 11 Billion dollars a year, but the government refunds 2 dollars out of every 3 dollars GST collected, leaving the government with about 4 billion dollars, which makes the GST not the money spinner as the government claims.  In other words, I am implying that GST was a formula used in deriving the City of London usury charges, as well as enabling the British banking circles in screwing the New Zealand people.  The reasons why the New Zealand government is raising the GST in October this year, - including the UK, and Canadian governments - and that is to pay the British for Iceland’s reneging debt, and in all likelihood help pay for the BP oil spill, just to bail out this company’s 18 million British superannuation shareholders.  Therefore, New Zealand’s house of cards, its fragile economy and financial situation, could collapse at any time, merely by the advent of something like a foot and mouth scare, or pan flu type of endemic. 

This is how New Zealand creates its money with its house of cards, or casino economy.  Several years ago, the New Zealand authorities made out that there was a so-called New Zealand labor skill shortage, with a population of 4 million people with 1 million taxpayers; the employers groups claimed that there was urgent need to import precious workers from Europe to fill the labor shortfall.  To give you an example of an import, Jim and his wife and his two children, thereby qualified for entry into New Zealand, because they able to meet the entry criteria by having substantial money and savings, making them eligible for permanent residence.  Jim sold his house for ½ million pounds, which at the time translated roughly into New Zealand 1.5 million dollars.  Jim bought a nice small farm (which has never yet produced anything) and was able to afford to send his two children to an expensive local private school, for Jim is doing the right thing here in New Zealand.  However, Jim like most immigrants soon discovered, that there was no shortage of labor in New Zealand; thereby Jim could never find work. 

Jims 1.5 Million Dollars, that he injected into New Zealand’s banking economy, now meant that the New Zealand banks and financial institutions, working on 6:1 derivatives,  (or maybe 30:1 derivatives, or fiats, or more), now could now lend out, and earn interest on something like 9 million dollars.  Depending on the type of lending institution, perhaps may be lending up to 45 million dollars into the New Zealand housing market.  (Deutsches Bank was lending on 100:1 derivatives; the Lehman Brothers were lending on 35:1derivatives, at the time before their collapse).  The British/Australian financial banking institutions, thereby they could make anywhere something like over > $180,000 a year @2% clear profit over costs, by lending out on Jims $1.5 million injected money, which instantly becomes > 9 Million banking dollars into the housing market.  Directly because of the spin on effect, of Jim’s money as it is regurgitating through New Zealand’s banking sector, this can blow out to $30 million to $45 million bank loan money, now becoming available to house and property borrowers.  As a reverberation, this was contributing to the creation of inflation, thereby as a direct consequence then making New Zealand housing unaffordable.  As a guesstimate, the New Zealand’s combined banking system is making something like, in clear profit earnings, > $600,000 profit a year out of Jim’s $1.5 Million, which he injected into the New Zealand banking economy.  Consequently, whatever the New Zealand’s Tweedledum or Tweedledee governments, when in power, they have no anxiety or qualms about the unemployment rate, or any concerns about the jobless figures they tout.  These hyped down unemployment figures, are totally being misrepresented, while the New Zealand government pretentiously and grudgingly pays out unemployment’s handouts, so long as the many immigrants, “the Jim’s of this world” turns up on New Zealand shores.  The New Zealand government claims, that there are 162,000 unemployed throughout New Zealand, there are one million taxpayers, who are paying tax, so the remainder of 2.8 Million New Zealand’s, the unaccountable people, cannot all be drug dealers, children, sickness, and invalids people, the aged people, and women having babies.  It is abundantly obvious, this Tweedledum or Tweedledee government is a bunch of liars, in the old adage; for figures do not lie, but figures sure lie, for all things are bright and beautiful in fantasy antipodies, for the New Zealand’s brainwashing department made it so.

New Zealand’s money is becoming valueless; this is attributed to the repetitive governmental obscene pay increases in the following groups, notably its most precious valuable workers, such as the elite civil servants, parliamentarians, elite council workers, as well as the professionals and the directors of companies, necessitating the payout for golden parachutes.  It appears that the higher salaries commission pay rates, as well as their annual pay increases, are indirectly calculated and influenced on elite British civil servant pay rates, as well as foreign exchange rates.  Take for example the recently cited 10 percent wage increase, during a governmental initiative and atmosphere of no further pay increases, just to compensate the elite New Zealand governments most precious valuable workers.  I have no doubts this pay increase, was triggered off, by the New Zealand Dollar being unofficially devalued in early 2009.  This New Zealand’s unofficial dirty devaluation was an election bribe, or a secret pledge, of course withheld from public notice and scrutiny, and then marketed as another wonder cure, or “aren’t we the new government nice and clever”.  Simply the New Zealand’s dollar operates on a dirty currency float.  Over two decades, the New Zealand’ dollar was pegged to be less than 91 cents to the Australian dollar.  In January 2009, without the usual fanfare, our new government, or whatever, unofficially altered the exchange rate from <AU 91 cents to <AU 81 cents, no doubt on some feeble excuse, and then promoted as an election “wonder cure bribe”, with the pretenses of helping exporters.  Since October 1968, when the British heel-clicking Robert Muldoon, decided on a 25% devaluation of the New Zealand dollar, bringing it down from US$1.4 to US$ 1.05.  The consequences of this subsequent devaluation triggered New Zealand’s hyperinflation for the next two decades, resulting in the continual nose-diving of the New Zealand economy and its ensuing ruination.  The blame for all of New Zealand economic ills, were directly and indirectly contributed to the 1968 New Zealand’s dollar 25% devaluation, and thereafter the repetitive Higher Salaries Commission and etc. pay increases, which really promoted inflation into double digits.  Furthermore, the regular government announcement of the frequent mini-budgets, thereafter the continual governmental short falls, these were remedied by the frequent numerous “wonder cure” trumpeted devaluations.  During the time of the 1968 British devaluation, the comedian British Prime Minister said, “There was nothing to fear, for it was the same Pound in your pocket”, and thus by hoodwinking the public, by stating the devaluation was making British exports much more competitive and cheaper.  This was the furthest from the truth.  As reported in a Pasadena Californian newspaper, just months after this famous October 1968 British devaluation.  To the annoyance and the complaints of the local Pasadena auto dealers, they stated, “British imported motor vehicles were now much more expensive to buy, than they had been before the 1968 British devaluation”.  

Recently, I have done some research; I discovered that a typical British housewife is able to buy New Zealand lamb at her local supermarket, which has been carefully selected, packaged, boxed, and transported 12,000 miles, much cheaper then what the 3^rd grade lamb sells for in the New Zealand shops.  A union Freezing worker pointed this out to me in early 2009, that a scraggy lamb (I was then told, you would not get much of a lamb for that price) has a market value of around $100.  Nonetheless, out of this market price, only $9 goes to the producer, $8.50 goes to the meat works for processing;  the transport costs are unknown, which may be around <$ 10?  The rest is all shear profit, which appears that certain people in New Zealand, or the City of London, or both have syphoned off the real earnings somehow.  I am inquisitive on how devaluing the New Zealand dollar helps the exporter producers, now working with higher costs, while still receiving lower returns, while the bigwigs elsewhere are raking in the big profits.

As said to me by a member of the Employers Federation, I like to be that average hypothetical person, earning that average pay rate as determined and calculated by the Higher Salaries Commission.  The truth is New Zealand is simply running on lies and pufferies by the Tweedledum and Tweedledee parties, or whatever, when elected into power, with the men from Britain behind the curtains pulling the strings.  These people are exposing the New Zealand population to eminent total economic collapse, with the possible consequence of the New Zealand populous may end up eating out of rubbish tins.  The Prime Minister  who ever, from whatever New Zealand Tweedledum or Tweedledee political party, dances up and down like a mannequin, and parrots everything whatever the British Prime Minster and the City of London says and orders. 

There were numerous “Jims of this world” that arrived in New Zealand around 2000 onwards, this creating a situation with the banks and loan companies having unlimited supply of loan money on their hands, turning New Zealand instantly into a speculative casino economy.  Property prices doubled overnight, and properties reached fantastic unrealistic phenomenal prices.  So much so, the loans on these properties became toxic, and there were many “let us get rich” property developers and finance companies, that were floated and developed, especially so with many picturesque colorful brochures handed out.  There were claims of fabulous fantastic potential earnings, however these companies were designed to inherently fail within a period of several years, as a consequence of the companies adding numerous directors, 30% salary increases, high payouts and their golden parachutes, consequently the final outcome was all the investors’ losing their money.  According to my Jewish relation involved in international banking, it is not very prudent to invest ones money in New Zealand.  To keep New Zealand house of cards economy pumped up, these companies had to demonstrate that they had growth factor, especially in a market where the New Zealand government was producing worthless banknotes and money, literally by the millions.  These companies now had so much overblown loan money on their hands, they threw caution and prudence aside, they were lending (gambling) money to all sorts of high risk and unsavory people, as well as to their friends, without the backing of any proper scrutiny or security, mostly lent on some wild let’s get rich schemes.  The loans became toxic overnight; eventually the companies collapsed taking the investors with them.  

At this time and still are, New Zealand’s most precious valuable people, the ones on pay rates governed by the higher salaries commission, were demanding their annual 20% pay rises and more.  Followed on by the professional people, the police gangsters union whose antics makes the wharfies, dock siders, or long shore unions demands, look pale in comparison, then the teachers and the nurses union, and so on the procession went, and the more you gave them, the more they always wanted.  The obligators of the City of London always figured, and regardless of the economic predicament, for they always waxed rich.  Nevertheless, the New Zealand’s “little people” never figured whatsoever, even with the indistinguishable so-called little people’s Tweedledum or Tweedledee representatives, when they were in government.  There were a number of widespread swindles (still being worked), with dishonest lawyers, company directors, land agents, property valuates, and so on, their illegal dodgy embezzlements goings on, are completely ignored by the New Zealand government, especially by the men behind the curtain. 

Even today, I know of many people been duped out of their life savings, property, and inheritances, for they have no possible legal remedy under the New Zealand way of doing things, while the New Zealand government appears to me to have authored and sanctioned some of these embezzlements.  For instance, as a whistle blower, I have exposed, numerous detailed lawyer embezzlement practices, which was contained in a 20-page letter report sent to the Minster of Justice, and I still waiting, and I am interested in hearing what kind of action the government is going to take.  I fear this is going to upset important people.  (Update, it appears that the ministry, have reluctantly implemented a few of my recommendations, to the annoyance of the lawyers).  However, it appears to me that the Minister of Justice does not want to know, or is uncomfortable hearing any kind of lawyer dishonesty talk.  His secretary tells you to complain to another body of lawyers, which unless you are prepared to name people, when, where, times and dates, they will completely ignore you, and I fear this would not make a scrap of difference, supposing even one complied with the legal complaints format.  As said by a lawyer, “I do not like squeaking on my mates”, which say it all.  The authorities considered these legal people cannot do any wrong by embezzling their clients in New Zealand, but supposing if the tables are turned, it would become the crime of the century, especially if somebody swindles the legal people, or the social welfare, even for a poultry sum of money.  I am not that bold, especially in an atmosphere, where your clients will continually withhold full disclosure from you, as well as turn on you when the slightest pressure applied to them by the authorities, suddenly they will develop amnesia, and then tell untruths just thinking that this will appease the authorities.  Likewise, New Zealand has British, but not American type of libel and slander laws.  Therefore, New Zealand has no real freedom of the press, or speech.  Nevertheless, I do fear, for the Minster of Justice’s government and the Justice Department, it appears to me, is somewhat deficient in having the necessary governmental courage, of having an open public inquiry, concerning a considerable number of lawyer dishonesty issues and practices.  However, the Minister’s Secretary informs me, that will or estates issues can be complex.  I have found that the only time that there are any complexities in a will, or an estate, is when the lawyers and barristers are colluding together for their own mutual benefit and pecuniary gain, whilst in the meantime holding on and dabbling with the estate monies.  I fear this “wishy-washy” pathetic government; will make a hullabaloo concerning lawyers’ sharp practices, such as legal aid, just to save a few pennies on the lawyers’ slush fund.  Ultimately, this inquiry will be quietly distracted and then fade into the background, when the simple-minded public focuses on other more important embellished issues, like the cricket, footy, All-Blacks, or yacht races.  If the people do officially complain about deception and fraud, mostly over dishonest lawyers involving property, property and property, the New Zealand governmental people, instantly labels and considers these complainants as “malcontents”.  To nullify these complainants (malcontents), without any proper kind of paperwork, like in a Stalinist state, suddenly they are instantly diagnosed, and considered as having mental disorders or problems.  The malcontents have, can be, be picked up by the police, then be placed in a mental hospital, or whatever, without ever going through any proper correct medical and legal procedural and paperwork channels.  I actually do know of a case, as well as having the experience of defending this person abducted.  Without any kind of warning, this person was abducted one Friday night, and then placed into a mental hospital, without any supporting paperwork, it appears to me all for trying legally to remedy a genuine property swindle,  involving something like $40,000 to $220,000, in a supposedly parcel of land sale.  The only thing the hospital authorities kept on mentioning, my client was upsetting important unidentified council people.  By some earthly means, the land sale money had become vaporized, the estate (or anyone to my knowledge) of which my client was a ½ share beneficiary, has never seen a red cent to this day for this parcel of land sale.  Upon my clients ordered immediate release by a judge, the final hospital report stated, “Lawyers acting inappropriately for pecuniary gain”.  Unless the New Zealand people want to spend a ½ million dollars, they do not realize that they have no legal protection whatsoever from the New Zealand courts and justice system.  Like in the TV advertisement, there is no Yetis Dave, I will say, “There is no integrity amongst most of the lawyers in New Zealand”.  

I also know of an American Jewish Professor, issued with a search warrant, on the grounds of allegedly searching for firearms.  Definitely, this person was not a Bin Laden lookalike, or the hunting and shooting type, and course the police obviously found nothing.  Strangely, this person claims that the police confiscated all his computer hard drives, in regards to his research and thesis into the disappearance of the West Coast frogs, which he attributed to the widespread use of a certain chemical pesticide, (outlawed in the USA) that was entering the West Coasts waterways.  It appears one can simply become an enemy of the New Zealand state, as well as the men behind the curtains, just by researching frogs, that go croak, croak?  I do fear this case is another New Zealand governmental setup, no doubt looking after their British mates interests AGAIN.  It is well- known in Jewish circles, that New Zealand governmental circles is very anti-Semite; perhaps this might be the reasons for the issuing of the search warrant.

New Zealand has a corrupt legal system, I advise people to have nothing do with lawyers, in most instances.  I have only known two successful legal cases, where people have actually benefited out of the courts system.  One was a company director, who sued a large New Zealand bank and won.  Another successful litigant claimant told me, it was not worth the effort, for he spent more time fighting his own lawyer(s) (I assume, from trying to rip him off), then the defendants of the court action.  He said to me, “I did not know I was winning, until I saw some of the jury crying their eyes on my behalf”.  In both of these actions, the losing defendants unsuccessfully appealed, and this will give you some idea of the legal costs that were involved.  The rest of the litigants that I know of, while some have been successful, all were taken to the cleaners, one claimant who won, lost a half million dollars in legal fees and court costs, in the 1990’s.  It appears to me that this claimant was rather naïve and did somewhat received inferior legal advice - as usual AGAIN.  This litigant tried to use the courts as a vendetta in settling old scores, and there were plenty of opportunities given for the litigant settling out of court.  That is the corrupt New Zealand legal system for you, or simply the British way of doing things.

On and on, the New Zealand government continually lied, in 2000 a new catch phrase emerged, “saving for ones future”, run on lines something like Australia’s Future fund.  The New Zealand government from 1999, had annually over billions of dollars of governmental surpluses, which the government of the day foolishly never gave any tax cuts, or considered ever removing GST, but instead put the surplus into what became labeled as the Cullen retirement fund (similar to Future Australia).  However, New Zealand news media, modeled on Orwell’s Oceania’s Ministry of Truth, always filters, muddles, and reports only what the government wants the populous to believe, or by assisting the men behind the curtains self-interests.  The New Zealand news media can literally turn black into white.  Just like in Orwell’s Oceania, nearly everybody in New Zealand at 6.00 pm, gazes spellbound, gob smacked at the television screen, while digesting all the propaganda served up to them on a silver plate, with no voices of discern ever being given or tolerated.  Then there are the hate secessions.  That is the reason why I watch the Australian SBS news, on Optus D1 160° east, 12648 V, 12,600 PID.  New Zealand is the only place other then North Korea, that I am aware of, in which one actually improves their intelligence and IQ factor, by not watching the TV news, reading a newspaper, or listening to the local radio stations. 

Many of the New Zealand people were mesmerized, into believing that the New Zealand government was looking after their tax/retirement money, in the Cullen fund.  This Cullen Fund would have been a great idea, investing into the local exporting businesses, as well as the local housing market, however of course this would have upset “the City of London” banking interests.  Simply it was, “You cannot do that - old boy”.  The problem was mainly with the governmental people running it, for they did not know what they are doing.  They knew nothing, as well as being completely unenlightened about derivatives and the principles of manufacturing money out of debt.  They thought the M3 statistical figure was some sort of British motorway.  Unwavering, owing to their underperformances , they decided in becoming casino high rollers, and threw all caution aside; now they would invest the surplus tax money, like throwing a dice on to a table game of crap, like the speculative US share market.  Each year, there would be a trumpet fanfare on the news, how much this speculative investment had materialized on paper.  I consider the then Minister of Finance at the time, was an innocent foolish party, a victim of duping, committed by unknown New Zealand public servants, who knew better, and course were paid more.  The Cullen scheme was doomed to fail, for one could not trust these governmental people to take the rubbish out to the curbside, let alone allow them to play with the taxpayer’s money on the US stock exchange.  Furthermore, the heavy-handed persuasive pressures from the self-interests of the City of London, as well as their influencing political payola, were all in the backdrop.  They were, and they still are, indirectly wielding, financially backing, and influencing in some way, the New Zealand Tweedledum, and the Tweedledee political parties.  They were also demanding the selling off and the closing of the newly formed New Zealand’s Kiwi Bank.  It is my opinion, that well over 2/3 rds of the taxpayer’s Cullen investment, has vaporized into thin air, therefore this means that15 Billion New Zealand Dollars of taxpayers investment is unrecoverable.  There has been an uncanny silence since 2008, for there has never been mentioned a word of explanation, as to how the Cullen fund, or the taxpayer’s investment, vaporized into thin air, for the taxpayers were definitely deceived.  I advised all sorts of people at the time, not to become embroiled in the Cullen Fund at a governmental level, as well as the Kiwi Saver, both “lets us get rich” British banking schemes.  Furthermore, in 2005, I wrote a letter to Michael Cullen, telling him of my premonition of disaster, by the New Zealand Government dabbling into the overseas share market, as well as allowing the injection and the creation of large quantities of money into the local economy (called inflation).  I made it quite clear to the then Minister of Finance, to take his hands off the crank handle of the New Zealand’s money printing press, and stop printing worthless money,  this advice was completely ignored.  This phony, or fiat loan money in circulation, had no backing whatsoever, (mostly it was volatile foreign short-term loan money, popularly known as squid money).  In November 2008, this kind of thinking and squid money investment, nearly bankrupted New Zealand, when this money supply flowed out of the country.

Furthermore, another big con is the KIWI saver, the previous government in its wisdom, decided that the New Zealand people should save and provide for their retirement.  Nevertheless, every employer and the people in employment had to contribute, something like 5% of their weekly income to the fund.  To allure people into the scheme, the government promised everybody who enrolled into the Kiwi savings scheme, a $1000 top-up.  The new government in 2009, decided to can the scheme altogether, as they claimed that is was unaffordable.  Initially, I commended the government, for I could see the depositors ending up in 40 years’ time, with a pile of worthless banknotes that might be able to buy $100 of groceries on today’s values, or possibly a postage stamp.  A few months ago, I happened to call into my Australian bank, without any prompting or asking, the bank staff tried to inveigle me into joining Kiwi Saver, AGAIN.  I thought at the time, it’s alive!  It’s alive!  The resurrected Frankenstein monster money swindle is still alive!

While I was in Germany, one of my relatives told me, during around 1923, working as a law clerk, he received pay twice a day with a wheelbarrow full of money.  Soon as they were paid, he would rush down to the shops to buy something with this almost worthless money, before everything escalated in price.  I liked the amusing tale, when my relation was travelling on a tram, the price of the tram ticket increased as the tram was rolling along.  A One Billion Mark banknote would not buy a loaf of bread.  These were the worst of times.  Prior to the First World War, there were almost 20 Marks to the British Pound. 

NB In the 1928 German currency reforms, 1,000,000,000,000 Marks became one Rentenmark, after 1948 Ten Rentenmarks became one Deutsch Mark.  In 2001, 2 Deutsch Mark became One Euro.

A premonition of things to come in New Zealand, read on.

http://www.usagold.com/germannightmare.html

Some jokester, or comedian, got up in parliament this week, around June 20, 2010, and spouted, “That New Zealand people should work hard, save hard”, and by doing so, suggesting that everybody in New Zealand will be living more or less in utopia.  AGAIN, another repeated old cliché.  Mind you, the British Prime Minister is a jokester when it comes to dabbling in clichés, like for example, in saving the welfare state, first he had to dismantle it.  It was something like heard during the Vietnam War period, to save a village they had to destroy it.  On the other hand, if it’s worth killing, it’s worth saving, from a TV program called SWAT.  Then you have the New Zealand Prime Minister and his party colleagues memorized by these British Prime Minister’s clichés and policies.  Hitherto we have the Prime Ministers from Britain and the former British Empire, who are strangely reluctant in implementing any US Glass-Steagall type of banking legislation, which would protect all their citizens from the banking collapses, fraud, and banking excesses of 2008.  No doubt, the New Zealand, Australian, the British government, and especially the men behind the curtains, would be horrified hearing this kind of talk, for they would be running around with their hands over their ears, and gasping like trout out of water. Simply you cannot take the New Zealand government seriously.   

Repeating what I have already written, “While the New Zealand poor man looked out of his gate in bewilderment, the beaming elite civil servant looked out from his dacha”. 

The principle of Glass-Steagall is to protect the necessary functions of banking, including deposit taking, from the predatory speculators; therefore, under Glass-Steagall-style regulations, this graph wouldn’t exist.

No banks that held deposits would be able to speculate in derivatives full stop, or engage in any other investment bank-style speculation.  Sourced from CEC.com.au

New Zealand has been a good friend of the United States, Australia, and Britain.  The fallout troubles with the United States, started back in the early 1980’s, the then Prime Minister Robert Muldoon was a very strong force to be reckoned with, and was accused of being responsible for making many financial blunders, which attributed to New Zealand’s eventful economic rumination.  To straighten the record, Mr. Muldoon carried out every order given to him, as directed by the British Government.  If Whitehall ordered him to take off the top brick off his chimney, Robert Muldoon would come back and say which brick.  Hypothetically speaking, supposing that the British Local Body Councils decided to paint all their offices with Chromium and purple paint.  Just imagine this paint and its application costing the ratepayers twenty times the normal price.  Nevertheless, in the following weeks, New Zealand would surely follow up, for every local council building overnight in New Zealand, would instantly decked out in this crazy color scheme.  The lucrative contract then awarded to friends of the government, to supply the Chromium paint and its application.  In the past, there have been numerous legislations originating from Whitehall origins, that were (and still are) rammed through the New Zealand parliament without any question. 

By 1980, the United Kingdom under a new leadership policies, (called the deregulation leadership, based on Enoch Powel’s policies, printed in his book, “Income tax 4/3 (22.1 new pence) in the Pound,” which became the new official British economic bible.  This later became known as Thatcher, and then Roger economics.  Nothing now was to be restrictive, no longer were there any financial restraints, or sacred cows, or taboos, and thereby Britain developed a diverse style of a gaming club economy.  I fear this was the time from around 1980, when the British government, the City of London, including the New Zealand civil service, started deliberately sabotaging Robert Muldoon’s Government.

By all indicators, Robert Muldoon should have enviably lost the general election in 1981, but Robert Muldoon held on to the government, with the smallest majority on record.  Just supposing 35 Rotura voters had voted the other way, Robert Muldoon’s government would have collapsed.  Quite unexpectantly, Robert Muldoon won the 1981 election, because of the controversial Springbok Rugby tour of 1981, which literally and fugitively speaking split New Zealand right down the middle, more so at the dining table.  People took sides for all kinds of reasons, some were fighting for the removal of the Muldoon government, some demonstrated for Black or White values, other saw the demonstrators as commies, peaceniks, or saints, others saw the demonstrators preventing, or interfering, in people watching a piece of leather being kicked around.  Violence was in the air, some wanted the police to smash in the heads of the demonstrators, others who hated Rugby, yet formed alliances, and fully supported the tour supporters.  Some of the demonstrators (rent a mob), had no concern whatsoever for African civil rights, but they used the occasion and the opportunity to vent their hostile anger on the police, who were the meat in the middle of the sandwich, during all these conflicts.  There were many various genuine peaceful lawful protests factions, for and against the tour, for all kinds of reasons.  The New Zealand television news media propaganda, which portrayed that Sport was the sole cause, that triggered all the tour discords; however, in reality sport was not the determining and the attributing factor of the tour protests.  Most probably, most of the antagonism and the vented fury associated with the Springbok tour, was largely contributed and incited somewhat, by a series of unbalanced television programs, called, “the White Tribe of South Africa”, aired sometime around 8.30 pm, on television, several Friday nights before the start of rugby tour.  The tour fallout, the outcome destabilized and changed the New Zealand’s political landscape forever.

After the election of 1981, the Robert Muldoon’s government became very shaky and unstable, at times with some of its members threatening to defect or resign, which bought out a number of crawlies out of the woodwork.  Some of the crawlies were anti-Americanism and anti-nuclear power.  Robert Muldoon was under enormous pressure from the overseas banking interests, to implement financial changes, and they were not interested in doing it the Robert Muldoon’s way.  By July in 1984, Robert Muldoon had no option, but to call an early election, the overseas bankers were blackmailing him in doing so, and the instability of the New Zealand economic situation, meant that he could not hold off the impending election until November.  I can recognize and understand why he was drunk at the time, then spontaneously without consulting his party president, he called an early election, and he said in his famous quip, “It does not give the other side much time either”.  According to his party president, this was furthest from the truth, the party collections were down and the party needed time to organize and finance an election campaign.  The other party was bulging to the brim with donations; I fear contributed indirectly in some way, in all probability by “the City of London”.  Furthermore, a new political newcomer, “the Freedom Party”, also became a major election spender, which came out of nowhere.  The final straw that broke the camel’s back, came on a Friday night, two weeks out from the 1984 election, when some elite high ranking party official from the future David Lange administration, was interviewed on some TV current affairs program, sometime around 8.00 pm, by stating that his new government was going to devalue the New Zealand dollar.  Like in Orwell’s Oceania, this overlooked piece of muddled history has been conveniently become vaporized, as though this event never occurred in New Zealand.  As a direct consequence, the news of the impending devaluation caused trepidation on the currency market exchanges, causing a panic and a run on the New Zealand Dollar, starting on the following Monday morning.  By the day of the election, New Zealand had no foreign money reserves left whatsoever.  New Zealand people had enough, and they voted Robert Muldoon out, incidentally the Freedom Party managed to score around 20 per cent of the popular vote, this would have translated into around 24 seats in today’s New Zealand electoral MMP environment.  Around this period, Rob Muldoon before the election was completely insular, without any realization or having any intelligence that financial forces were gathering to oppose him.  This suggests to me that New Zealand’s spy force and elite governmental people had been plotting against him. 

After the election, anti-Americanism then showed its ugly head, there always had been some prior mutterings by the usual Soviet factions in a major political party.  This had never been an issue before or during the 1984 election.  Without any consultation with the New Zealand voters, the anti-Americanism started, when it was initially touted that New Zealand was banning all Nuclear weapons, then over time it became more belligerent and then developed somewhat into banning nuclear propelled ships into New Zealand waters.  The Americans tried to settle diplomatically, but instead the New Zealand elite civil servants led the Americans merrily up the garden path, while secretly undermining them.  I fear David Lange was the chief instigator, as well as unknown others, who were more or less was driving the whole thing. 

After making a few tests and probes, the US Secretary of State, Mr. Shultz, learned about this devious deal made between the unions and financers, as well as the elite New Zealand governmental people were making fools of them.  The US State Department had enough of all this deceit, they let the rope go, which immediately cast New Zealand adrift, instantly New Zealand became a third-world country.  From that moment forth, New Zealand had to be completely reliant on Britain.  To show you what kind of loyalty the United Kingdom has for the United States, all it would have taken was one word from the then British Prime Minster, or the City of London, to David Lange, this would have been sufficient in preventing the impasse between the United States and New Zealand from ever occurring. 

As told to us, by a certain elite person, before the 1984 election, a secretive dirty arrangement, or a deal made between the overseas and local financial interests (possibly the City of London), and the hammer and sickle supporting unions.  The agreement made with the new government, was they would abandon the United States, in exchange and on the understanding, that there was to be no union opposition, or any disruption to the proposed financial deregulation controls in being implemented by the new Lange government.  The new government also bought off unions, by offering those unionists top jobs on boards, and then to add insult to these corruptions, union members were required to contribute more than ever to the unions, so that the union bosses could drive around in their brand new Ford Falcons, with their noses in the air.  For the New Zealand employees, these were the worst of times under David Lange, and they had no longer had any meaningful protection whatsoever from the New Zealand courts, other than non-effective pretentious union protection, which sounded very pleasing to the ears of simple minded people, but meant absolutely nothing.  To avoid paying any kind of redundancy, many sacking invented excuses were devised, and then appeared in printed form in some employer’s  A4 green covered “do it yourself sacking” handout booklets, enclosed with a cartoon “all staff are virgins” on how to sack superfluous staff.  For the ordinary people, their original Labor contracts were now almost meaningless, virtually were hollow and insincere.  Employers overnight had skilled themselves in all kinds of excuses to sack staff, mostly and totally based on slander and libel, just to avoid paying out any kind of redundancy.  Many an employee, at the time, became unemployable, blacklisted, and were defenseless against these malicious employer libel and slander whispering campaigns.  This former working generation was referred to “as the generation lost in space, or the sacrificed generation”, also it was said “the reason that why they are unemployed, is because they haven’t got a job”, as quoted by elite New Zealand civil servants.  I remembered a headmistress of a school around at this time saying to me, “I tell my girls, and you never stop learning”, which says it all.  New Zealand workers virtually had no legal protection whatsoever from the governments and employers onslaught.  In 1991, this situation remedied itself after the election of Jim Bolger’s government.  Douglas Graham the then Minister of Justice, introduced legislation to protect New Zealand workers into the framework of the court system.  The Employer’s Federation soon became quite concerned and alarmed; now they were complaining that they were losing too many cases in court. 

Footnote: today we have the New Zealand government with the backing of the employers groups, trying to legislate sick days, this new (old) law is exactly comparable to the non-legislative sick day law as it was in 1987.  It was alleged, that the freezing works management requested this change, strangely most of the freezing workers are considered temporary workers and do not qualify for any sick leave by working short-term (under 6 months) labor contracts.  I have this premonition that the City of London originated and sponsored this new sick day law.

David Lange was right, when he said, the White House preferred the company of gangsters, in preference to David Lange visiting the White House.  In the last year of Lange’s administration, the whole of his government was falling to bits, and in the outgoing administration, there were numerous wacko policies implemented.  This was widely known in amongst legal circles, that the PM showed wide antagonism towards his unpopular Finance Minister.  The hearsay at the time stated, that the PM had lost control of him.  It was widely known that David Lange’s marriage was now in question and was disintegrating.  Furthermore, as a death wish, taking on the portfolio of being the Minister of Education, for “Tomorrows schools” was a hot bed for receiving constant teacher controversy, antagonism, as well as receiving their splurging of rage and fury.  Owing to the stresses, his health started to pack up; within six months after hearing this kind of whispering talk, David Lange resigned.  The best thing that I liked about David Lange, not as an eloquent speaker, or winning the Oxford debate, but as a honest poor man’s lawyer, that helped out some poor person in some insignificant case, of no real importance.  On New Zealand’s television news media, the events portrayed as David versus Goliath (USA), but in reality, this was all a myth and furthest from the truth.    

The ”51st-State Party”  name is registered, while the ”51st-State Party” flag logo is acceptable to the US government,  but it’s unacceptable to the New Zealand electoral commission, to be placed on a ballot paper, for according to their reckoning, this might cause some confusion with uninformed voters, that the United States government is endorsing the ”51st-State Party”.  I never heard so much ambiguous talk in my life, and way the electoral commission is talking, it appears to me that our party is already is the third major political player in New Zealand, before we have even started. 

I fear the outcome of this Christchurch mayoral election, is going to be decided (so far) by three entities, which will capture the voters’ imagination.  The Christchurch voters will have a choice of voting for the typical Tweedledum and Tweedledee candidates, or simply put, “the Peoples’ Republic of Christchurch”, and “the hollow peoples’ friends”, I do fear with the City of London obligators and their influences in the backdrop, with the odious, annoying little 51st-State party floating around in the background. 

Why is the 51st State Party contesting the Christchurch mayoralty?  The answer is that, I or we, seriously do not want the mayoralty, nevertheless we are more interested in recruiting genuine membership, gaining publicity, and persuading people to our cause, so by them joining, and voting for the 51st-State Party at a general election.  It is too dangerous any other way, for the electronic voting counting in New Zealand, is hazardous for one’s political reputation.  In some circles, they claim that the New Zealand electronic voting is suspect.  Especially so, when a certain police superintendent in the past, used gangster language phrases like, “fixing me, and you know what I mean,” and “every time we try to fix you, the more you come back at us”.  Furthermore, “we don’t like your policies”, which I thought was rather strange, since in the past; there has been a total news media blackout embargo on all my policies.  I was utterly astounded, for I have no doubts in my mind that this police superintendent, was insinuating about the New Zealand authorities committing election fraud as New Zealand State policy.  During the late 1990’s, there were claims made by the Prime Minister’s office staff, that I was an agent of the US government, which I have never confirmed or denied.  Then in past years, I became aware of unsubstantiated allegations of past council election voting papers catching fire, happening two hours after a certain local body’s candidate asked for a recount.  It seems, where there is smoke near ballot papers, there may be possible election fraud.  Spanning over thirty years, to my knowledge this is quite astonishing, as well as quite abnormal, when I can never recall a local body election recount anywhere in New Zealand.  According to numerous web sources, which have made wide assertions that George Bush during the 2000 election, they say his election to office, was somehow attributed to a computer voter rigging conspiracy, and committed by unknown officials?  The latest update of a person claiming election fraud, go to http://www.clintcurtis.com/about.asp.  It is very easy to bundle these theorists together and label them “conspiracy theorists”.  However if you read Cliff Curtis sound articulate arguments put forward, which have been tested under a polygraph test, they stack up well, and are quite logical to a reasonable thinking person.  However to illustrate the others point of views, another group sent me a computer program to give me a small computer demonstration, on how electronic vote rigging was accomplished.  I was astounded, by using this small simple computer software program, for anyone could easily manipulate the electronic voting results to flip-flop, to whatever kind of default ballot readout one so desired.  Without the backing of paper ballot papers, for it is impossible to check the integrity of the electronic ballot.  Furthermore, it was stated that no American voter that participated in any electronic voting, in the absence of paper balloting - in a number of the States – the voters never knew for an absolute certain, that their vote was properly recorded, since there were no voting receipts given, checks, or balances done to check the integrity of the electronic voting system.  The States that used electronic ballot voting, there were a constant number of irregularities, but the States that had traditional paper ballot voting, there were no problems at all.  This American body is calling for the reintroduction of proper paper US ballot box elections.  The US State of Florida, since 2008, has returned to paper ballot voting.  Most probably, the New Zealand local body elections, uses a clone type of Diebold voter OCR recognition vote counting machine and software, which its use, has stirred quite a controversy in the US, and it appears is quite susceptible to viruses and unauthorized reprogramming.

Voting at New Zealand general elections uses the paper ballot box.  This is quite to contrary to the local body elections, where the vote counting is solely done with electronic vote counting, this becomes the paramount voting authority, therefore is not susceptible to challenges in any way whatsoever.  Unlike New Zealand’s general elections, in a local body’s election, there is no structure in place to allow a candidate to challenge, or request a ballot paper recount, or a printout of the machine code of the computer software program, in attempt to authenticate and check the integrity of the results.  It appears to me these anomalies are quite a common occurrence and the norm throughout New Zealand.  I fear and have strong doubts that any candidates, in any past local bodies, health bodies, or school elections throughout New Zealand, has ever in recent times, ever received a true accurate vote count.  The New Zealand authorities frequently talk all about democracy, thereby convincing a number of hopefuls, or mugs, to spend thousands of dollars of their own money, on their local body’s election campaigns.  However, these hopefuls might do well and obtain the largest portion of the vote, yet at the wrap-up of their efforts, they will be wondering why they got nowhere.  These hopefuls will be scratching their heads in bewilderment and dismay, what went wrong, for they will not perceive or understand the reasons why, as to what contributed to their low voter count, which unbeknown to them, I fear, is prejudiced by New Zealand’s widespread voting fiddle factors.  One can predict the outcome of a local body election, especially so when a newspaper mentions, that so and so, a well-known, well established sitting candidate, is unlikely to be reelected, while also stating a hopeful candidate A or B, is a serious threat to this sitting candidate.  Strangely, without fail this popular sitting candidate will lose the election.  It appears to me, that the news media is sanctioned by government’s (elite secret police?), in writing these repulsive articles, or is somewhat influenced and driven by other New Zealand governmental people.  It’s no use complaining, to the police, or the electoral commission, for they do not want to hear.  The Newspapers will demonize the more popular well-known candidates.  Just supposing a hopeful candidate, makes just a simple statement, e.g. each word is in number sequence #1, 2, 3, to 263.  Next day, the newspapers will quotes something totally different out of word order sequence, something like words sequence order #183, 184, 2, 3, 44, 253, 7, 150… and so on.  All what has being quoted is quite true, nevertheless the quoted wording is so jumbled and muddled around, meaning to say that the words quoted, are taken completely out of context, which are cunningly arranged to comply with the election law, but are specifically designed to misrepresent, or muddle the quoted facts, and mislead the voters.  Added into the voting factor, that one person fills in over 80% of the two or more postal voting papers, (postal voting), which are delivered to each household’s mailbox.  Supposing one cites, about the local bodies in restoring proper ballot box type of elections, and to abandon the postal electronic voting, suddenly governmental people really loathe and despise you.  I like to know whose was responsible, in the elite New Zealand governmental administration, who thought up and introduced the OCR voting machines into New Zealand local bodies elections?  I fear the British.

As I have stated previously, New Zealand has the worst refined corruption practices in the entire OECD, with the New Zealand authorities committing untold dishonesties.  The New Zealand system is so dishonest, for virtually no one has any protection from the New Zealand governments and its legal system, as well as the dishonest lawyers who are lethargic, frequently defraud, and pad their accounts for doing absolutely nothing.  From anybody’s point of view, if you complain, you will receive no assistance whatsoever, and by engaging a lawyer in trying to remedy a governmental situation, thereby it becomes a meaningless pointless exercise, and is comparable to employing virtual criminals to represent you.  For instance, with a high percentage of the New Zealand lawyer dealings, under the United States Law statues - regarding US Postal fraud, these lawyers could face up to ten years in jail.  Once upon a time, one could go to a newspaper, or their Member of Parliament, and people did care, and they would do something about it, but not today, these dodgy illegal practices go unnoticed and are quite acceptable, by New Zealand’s untrustworthy government administration, working for their own self-interests?  There is virtually no freedom of the press in New Zealand, which appears dominated by overseas-owned news media, as well as influenced by the New Zealand government. 

In 1986, a former MP candidate, standing for parliament, nominated me for the position of Branch Electorate Chairman of a certain New Zealand political party electorate.  At the time there were two candidates standing, so a ballot vote was called for and held.  Later on at the general meeting, after supposedly counting of the votes, they told me I was unsuccessful, and then someone eagerly put a motion on the floor to destroy all the ballot papers.  I had completely forgotten about this advent, until reminded in 2002, when informed by a Chairman, of another smaller political party.  The Chairman told me that the former political party, that I had once belonged to, considered me a huge joke around a certain Members of Parliament’s office, it was widely known, discussed, and joked around, that I had overwhelmingly won the 1986 election as Chairperson of the electorate.  What has happened to me, this can happen to anyone around New Zealand, by the New Zealand governmental defilers of the natural selection process, especially when in charge of any kind of OCR electronic voting? 

I have had the experience many times, of instantly becoming what is termed as “vaporized” (therefore I do not exist) by the newspapers, as well as the New Zealand authorities.  For example, I was coming out of court with my client on my left, who was walking beside me; next thing we both heard was the clack clack noise of a camera, by a newspaper photographer, who had hidden around the court building.  Just like in Orwell’s Oceania, the newspaper went to a lot trouble in cutting me out from the picture, which happens so frequently, in making sure that I receive no public recognition whatsoever.  The men behind the curtains do consider me as an enemy of the New Zealand State.  As far as the New Zealand authorities are concerned, therefore I must not exist.  This is because the New Zealand authorities are so corrupt, and always out to appease their City of London friends, certainly they do not want the public to hear, or take any notice me, or acknowledge my candor.  I also have knocked over many “lets us get rich schemes”, while also exposing dirty legal dealings, and this I understand this has earned me the name, as the “witch hunter” in some of the “good old boy” circles.  The lawyers and governmental people do revile me.  My opinion from experience, that the New Zealand lawyers are nothing but just glorified law clerks, which have no respect for the law or their clients.

The City of London, or the men behind the curtains, supposing they decide that they need you in government, or whatever, you will quietly receive the nod, the election just becomes a formality, more or less you becomes instantly elected, even before the votes are delivered and counted.  Supposing this group of governmental people spurn you, or hate your policies, by fair or foul means, they will make sure that you would never ever, become elected. 

Talking about New Zealand spy mania, I observed in the late 1990’s, at one certain Member’s of Parliament’s office, I counted three, or perhaps five spies, or agents operating.  I believe one agent was working for British intelligence, another Australian Intelligence, the other New Zealand intelligence, furthermore another one was reporting directly to parliamentary services, and other one was closely watching the New Zealand intelligence agent.  In this Members of Parliament office, as well any major party constitutional, and list seat MP’s offices throughout New Zealand, for every incoming phone calls, as well as outgoing phone calls, including emails, are being monitored, as well as certain mail being steamed open, by certain people working outside the office.  (This shows you how clever Donna - a former Member of Parliament, convicted for fraud - was able to elude and remain undetected for years, by her office spy force.)  The joke is that these intelligence people in the spy force all hate one another, for they are constantly observing and scrutinizing each other’s movements.  In the late 1990’s, I do not understand the reasoning, why the Prime Minister staff said to me, they were no longer allowed to talk me, because I was considered an US agent.  Spying seems to be an obsession with the New Zealand authorities, yet two Israeli intelligence agents could easily handle all of New Zealand’s dangerous people, whom are genuine threats to New Zealand security.  There are vast numbers of people in New Zealand, working in some capacity for the New Zealand intelligence gravy train, such as the news media, talk back hosts, etc., making any collected information somewhat inflated, exaggerated, dubious, and unreliable.  At a meeting of 200 people, the then Deputy Prime Minister, in an indirect sort of way without naming me, said, I was clever and dangerous, to an audience of 200 people, whose eyes were all of sudden started focusing on and glaring at me.  However, I took this as a compliment.  The emotive word “dangerous” used in this instance,  like used in “dangerous Maori,” is when a person with a few brains, does not accept the standard official versions of the facts presented, if becomes noticed and then is paid attention to, he/she becomes labeled then as “dangerous”.  You may ask where the interests of the New Zealand people come into the equation, the answer, for they do not figure, since there is no accountability, and the New Zealand political system is all an illusion.

Unlike other candidates, I have forayed into countless actions, using my hatchet-fighting techniques, as well as having actually achieved and done something, which the newspapers for reasons only known to them, do not wish to recognize.  As said to me by a former Member of Parliament, I do not know of anyone that has done as much as you.  In addition, further sayings, which claim, I have saved more taxpayers money, the council ratepayer’s money, and people’s lives, then all the Members of Parliament put together.

I have saved each Christchurch ratepayer $1000 a year in water rates since 1995; this was surprising an easy thing to do, because nobody was committed to the fray, as well as I having the technical skills, besides, no one would undergo the unpleasant spiteful hatchet fighting that I encountered, during this undertaking.  The council authorities tried to make out there was a water shortage in Christchurch, and seawater was penetrating Christchurch’s aquifer system, basically it was all a scare hoax,  or I fear another let’s get rich scheme, with the government eventually selling off the Christchurch’s water supply to a British water company, as a takeover.  The British are always interested in investing in water.  I attended all the water hearings,  and I wrote a lengthy detailed technical water report, which painstakingly dispelled and nullified all of the council’s wild claims, which I sent on to the Ministry of Internal affairs, who immediately then told the council, to cancel the council’s pending “let’s get rich water charging policy”.  I totally was responsible, for single handily knocking over, the council’s proposed water-charging scheme, for there was nobody else in the skirmish.

The council staff tried to implement “the let us get rich” water charging scheme two years later, again I knocked the council on the head. 

I also single handily knocked over the police’s proposed firearm registration scheme, which was going to cost the New Zealand taxpayer billions of dollars.  In fairness to the police, I will not go through the process, of how I exposed all the corruption and deceit.

When the then new Prime Minster canceled the proposed police’s firearm registration scheme, she quoted me exactly verbatim, all what I had written as well as advised her, the only slight difference being, that the words ½ billion dollars, were replaced with words, one billion dollars.  A few years later, a senior police officer complained angrily in my home, using gangster language, and told me, that I cost them thousands (actually millions of dollars), and  I was told that I was totally responsible for terminating their proposed cherished firearm registration scheme, and they, the police, would not allow me to get away with that again.  Furthermore, they wanted me to send any mail, or submissions to them first, for their perusal, before sending them on to the Members of Parliament.   

Furthermore, I proudly saved umpteen New Zealand people lives, on the never-ending hospital waiting list, which was going to fund this governmental “the let us get rich” firearm registration scheme, with their lives, while some members of the police gangster union, some more equal than others, would be living it up, in their new cushy high-paying jobs.   

I also had to invoke the protection of the United States flag here in New Zealand, and I came under the protection of the US Congress, whom requested Lord Williams of Moysn, the British Attorney General to intercede on my behalf.  This worried New Zealand authorities, overnight they had a change of mind, suddenly overnight we all became the best of bosom friends, to one another.  All I can say, it is a wonderful feeling invoking the US flag protection, for I never felt so safe in my life.  However, there is something terribly wrong with the New Zealand political system, when one fearing for their lives, has to seek asylum and protection of another country.  

Through my efforts by writing to all the governmental people, a certain Auckland gun dealer involved in a recent shooting stickup, one might say he received one of my legal specialties, “a trial before Parliament”.  Put it another way, the governmental people saw things my way, and I did not like this dealer’s chances going through the court system.  I have never known this to happen before, with the police prosecution backing way, for regardless in this type of situation, they always prosecute, that is their policy, while even knowing that the prosecution will fail.  

While in bed, recovering in a hospital during February 2009,  I heard frequently on the radio, that the Christchurch City Council AGAIN were going to implement water meter charging, the blah-blah talk went something like this, there was now a shortage of water, and the old disproven lying tale that seawater was penetrating the Christchurch aquifers surfaced again.  The radio stated that anybody, could write in a submission by a certain date, and make their views heard at the Christchurch City Council, this I did while still in bad health, by writing another water report.  At the water hearing, there were several speakers before me, which mostly I had to suffer hearing all their gushy goo-goo talk submissions, on how lovely and wonderful the Christchurch City Council was, before my submission came up.  However, the jolly mood of the council instantaneously changed, when all the other previous submitters had left.  I told them how the real Christchurch water situation was, based entirely on real scientific facts and data, furthermore they were being duped, by the elite New Zealand governmental people, into enacting water meter charging, thus in enabling the government to sell off the Christchurch City Council water supply, cheaply, to a certain British water company.  The councilors then listen to me attentively, and then I watched the penny drop, the councilors had been pretentiously ignoring everything that I had said previously, then instantly they saw things my way.  Of course, they had no desire in selling off the Christchurch City Council’s water supply, which they wrote in their final report.  In the meantime, I sent a lengthy water report to the Minister of Local Affairs, which exposed all.  Four days later, certain elite council staff were all giving me filthy looks, and nor was any word concerning water charging, ever spoken from that point of time. 

The New Zealand governmental people were furious, how could this happen, upsetting their City of London friends, as well as undoing all their hard work, and months later, it appears that they took out their vendetta on the Canterbury Regional Council, by sacking the elected Regional Councilors.  On the other hand, because of poor intelligence, I consider they sacked the wrong council, in the assuming that they had assisted me.  Nevertheless, there were two reasons for the sackings, one, they were not happy with three of the elected councilors on the Regional Council, and by sacking the whole council, thereby they underhandedly could remove the influences they cast, and then the Regional Council could start over again in four years’ time without them.  I have a strange premonition, knowing about the New Zealand council’s funny goings on, I fear it would be impossible for these particular three candidates, in reestablishing themselves back onto the Regional Council in four years’ time.  Secondly, the other reasons were, in more or less in disciplining the Christchurch City Councilors, who the New Zealand authorities had feared had fallen under my influence.  For the government to justify the Regional Council’s sackings by saying that they were all dysfunctional, this is all fiction.  It seems the more you give people water rights, the more they want to take water; somehow, you have to draw a line in sand.  For example, I know of a person using devious means and political corruption, proposed to establish a new “let’s get rich” dairy farm, he then made a water rights application, subsequently this was turned down by the Regional Council.  His farm is situated in watershed area; therefore, the council discouraged the water rights application, since the cows’ effluent would end up polluting Christchurch’s Aquifers system.  The logistics means that each cow, consumes an IMP 44-gallon, or US 55-gallon drum (.2³ meter) of water per day, with a dairy farm, and then there is the cleaning, in all likelihood, where does the effluent go?  In this specific situation, the effluent would either enter the Waimakeri River, or soak straight down into Christchurch’s aquifer system.  Take a herd of 400 cows, each using 0.5³ meters of water a day, this = 200³ meters of water extraction which = effluent.  The rejected applicant was bitterly upset with the Regional Council, when they turned down his application, and he then went off winging about the Regional Council to anybody that would bother to listen to him.  No doubt, there were plenty of eager listeners in the government, and other organizations, who no doubt were outraged at his application being declined.  However, they never considered that 160³ meters of effluent daily, would be entering into Christchurch aquifers system.  Christchurch aquifers are closed type, and what goes down there, stays down there.  Now the government makes out that staff and the councilors were, impeding the council’s application progress, but one can still work around the three so-called dysfunctional people blocking progress.  The regional council representatives were not dysfunctional, they been more technically literate, would have a better technical understanding and therefore they stuck to their guns on the different water issues, thus making the government, and their friends, the British obligators frustrated.  Now all of sudden, the government has a change of mind, no doubt after reading my election profile statement, “by not selling the Christchurch water supply to a certain British water company” .  Today, August 24, 120,000 colored A3 pamphlets, costing by my estimation around >$5 each, including delivery charges – authored and paid for by a certain Tweedledum or Tweedledee political party - were delivered to whole of Christchurch.  The question I ask myself, where did the money, the estimated1/2 million dollars advertising spenditure come from?  A 1/2 million dollars, this takes quite a lot collecting by any political party organization standards, why would an political organization spend this kind of money on a town that is generally speaking is biased towards this party?  Why would they even bother?  Why then would this party be bothered listening to, what they term is the 99.98% DW Factor, and then asking for their opinions?  However, I do fear that the men behind the curtains, (the British obligators), were donators on this recent advertising splurge, no doubt in assisting the government by wanting to buy into Christchurch’s water supply.  Is the government insinuating, or is suggesting in their recent pamphlet, that the people of Christchurch, only wants Elected appointed representatives on the Regional Council, and it does not matter if they are technically illiterate, for they will rubber stamp everything put before them.  As Abraham Lincoln said at Gettysburg 1863, “a government by the people, for the people, shall never perish from the face of the earth”.  In the last thirty years almost, the government of the people, by the people, has certainly perished in New Zealand.

Around in May 2009, I received a letter from a person, with a high fluting sounding name, such as words to the effect, “in charge of democracy in the Christchurch City Council”, and I was told to stay away from the Christchurch City Council’s - something sounding like - its 10-year plan hearings, or whatever, committee meetings.  It appears that they did not want hear any of my contributions. 

That’s, Democracy in action, at the Christchurch City Council for you.  

I have a saying, but for the greater the odds, the greater the glory.  

We are looking forward for you in joining us.

Yours truly

Paulus B Telfer 

Contact details

39 Liverton Crescent

Bryndwr

Christchurch 8053

Phone 359 8147

Cell #1   027 710 5628

Cell #2   021 167 7942

Email nz51state@gmail.com

Have you integrity, interested in becoming a member, or want to become a candidate, or you have some special skill, then we looking forward to hearing from you.

Please contact the above address.

I wish to make a Party donation, or become a member

51st-State Party KIWI Bank account

The”51st-State Party of New Zealand”

# 38-9010-07754720-00

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Email Me